- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-526/20: Action brought on 12 August 2020 — Devin v EUIPO — Haskovo Chamber of Commerce and Industry (DEVIN)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0526
62020TN0526
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 339/28
(Case T-526/20)
(2020/C 339/36)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Devin EAD (Devin, Bulgaria) (represented by: B. Van Asbroeck, G. de Villegas and C. Haine, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Haskovo Chamber of Commerce and Industry (Haskovo, Bulgaria)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark DEVIN — European Union trade mark No 9 408 865
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 May 2020 in Case R 2535/2019-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 59(1)(a), in conjunction with Articles (7)(1)(c) and 7(3) or Article 59(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 59(1)(a), in conjunction with Article (7)(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 59(1)(a), in conjunction with Article (7)(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.