I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
2013/C 359/31
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: H&M Hennes & Mauritz BV & Co. KG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: H. Hartwig and A. von Mühlendahl, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Yves Saint Laurent SAS (Paris, France)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 8 July 2013 given in Case R 208/2012-3;
—Declare the registered Community design No 61 3294-0002 invalid; and
—Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings, including those incurred before the Board of Appeal.
Registered Community design in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: A design for the product ‘handbags’ in Class 03-01 — registered Community design No 61 3294-0002
Proprietor of the Community design: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community design: The applicant
Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: The grounds were those laid down in Articles 4 to 9 and 25(1)(c), (d), (e), (f) and (g) of Council Regulation No 6/2002
Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejected the application for a declaration of invalidity
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 6 of Council Regulation No 6/2002.