- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-891/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 January 2022 — European Commission v Hubei Xinyegang Special Tube Co. Ltd, ArcelorMittal Tubular Products Roman SA, Válcovny trub Chomutov a.s., Vallourec Deutschland GmbH (Appeal — Dumping — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/804 — Imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes originating in China — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 — Article 3(2), (3) and (6), and Article 17 — Determination of injury — Examination of the effect of dumped imports on the prices of like products sold on the EU market — Analysis of price undercutting — Application of the product control number (PCN) method — Obligation of the European Commission to take into account the different market segments relating to the product under consideration and all sales of like products by the sampled EU producers)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0891
62019CA0891
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.3.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 119/4
(Case C-891/19 P) (1)
(Appeal - Dumping - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/804 - Imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes originating in China - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 - Article 3(2), (3) and (6), and Article 17 - Determination of injury - Examination of the effect of dumped imports on the prices of like products sold on the EU market - Analysis of price undercutting - Application of the product control number (PCN) method - Obligation of the European Commission to take into account the different market segments relating to the product under consideration and all sales of like products by the sampled EU producers)
(2022/C 119/05)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: European Commission (represented initially by T. Maxian Rusche and N. Kuplewatzky, and subsequently by T. Maxian Rusche and A. Demeneix and, finally, by T. Maxian Rusche and by K. Blanck, acting as Agents)
Other parties to the proceedings: Hubei Xinyegang Special Tube Co. Ltd (represented by E. Vermulst and J. Cornelis, advocaten), ArcelorMittal Tubular Products Roman SA, Válcovny trub Chomutov a.s., Vallourec Deutschland GmbH (represented by G. Berrisch, Rechtsanwalt)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 24 September 2019, Hubei Xinyegang Special Tube v Commission (T-500/17, not published, EU:T:2019:691);
2.Refers the case back to the General Court;
3.Reserves the costs.
(1)
Language of the case: English.
ECLI:EU:C:2022:140
* * *
(1) Language of the case: English.