I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2013/C 260/76
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Groupe Léa Nature (Périgny, France) (represented by: S. Arnaud, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Debonaire Trading Internacional, Lda (Funchal, Portugal)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Declare the application admissible;
—Annul decision R 203/2011-1 of the First Board of Appeal for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 26 March 2013, notified 18 April 2013;
—Order DEBONAIRE TRADING INTERNACIONAL LDA and OHIM each to bear the costs, which they have incurred in the course of the proceedings before the General Court.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant
Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘SO’Bio ētic’, for goods in classes 3, 24 and 25 — Community trade mark application No 6 827 281
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registrations and United Kingdom trade mark registrations of the word mark ‘SO…?’et al., for goods in classes 3 and 25
Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision and rejected the CTM application with respect to all goods claimed in classes 3 and 25
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8 (1)(b) and (5) of CTMR.