15.6.2020

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/33

(Case T-164/20)

(2020/C 201/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: BG (represented by: A. Tymen, L. Levi, and A. Champetier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—annul the defendant’s decision dated 20 May 2019 rejecting the applicant’s request for assistance of July 2017;

—if needed, annul the defendant’s decision dated 10 December 2019 rejecting the applicant’s complaint dated 20 August 2019;

—grant compensation of the applicant’s moral harm suffered by the fault of the defendant, evaluated at the sum of 50 000 Euro;

—reimburse the applicant’s incurred costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging the violation of the fundamental right to be heard (article 41, paragraph 2, a) of the Charter).

2.Second plea in law, alleging the violation of the fundamental right to have his affairs treated impartially and fairly (article 41, paragraph 1, of the Charter) and the violation of article 24 SR and of the duty of care.

3.Third plea in law, alleging the violation of the fundamental right to receive a decision that states reasons (article 41, paragraph 2, c) of the Charter and article 25 SR).

4.Fourth plea in law, alleging an error of assessment and breach of articles 12a and 24 SR. On the request for compensation, the applicant exposes the fault committed by the defendant, the damage she suffered and the link between the fault and the damage.