- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-367/23: Action brought on 5 July 2023 — Amazon Services Europe v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN0367
62023TN0367
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
21.8.2023
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 296/41
(Case T-367/23)
(2023/C 296/46)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Amazon Services Europe Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: A. Conrad, M. Frank, R. Spanó and I. Ioannidis, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the European Commission Decision of 25 April 2023 designating Amazon Store as a very large online platform, in accordance with Article 33(4) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council (C(2023) 2746 final);
—alternatively, annul the European Commission Decision of 25 April 2023 designating Amazon Store as a very large online platform, in accordance with Article 33(4) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council (C(2023) 2746 final), insofar as it imposes on Amazon the obligation to provide users with an option for each recommender system that is not based on profiling under Article 38, and declaration of inapplicability of Article 38 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council (C(2023) 2746 final);
—furthermore, or alternatively, annul the European Commission Decision of 25 April 2023 designating Amazon Store as a very large online platform, in accordance with Article 33(4) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council (C(2023) 2746 final), insofar as it imposes on Amazon an obligation to compile and make publicly available an advertisement repository under Article 39, and declaration of inapplicability of Article 39 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council (C(2023) 2746 final); and,
—order the European Commission to bear the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging that the designation as a very large online platform, in accordance with Article 33(4) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council (C(2023) 2746 final), is based on a discriminatory criterion and disproportionately violates the principle of equal treatment and the applicant’s fundamental rights.
2.Second plea in law, alleging that Article 38 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council (C(2023) 2746 final) violates the principle of equal treatment and the applicant’s fundamental rights.
3.Third plea in law, alleging that Article 39 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council (C(2023) 2746 final) violates the principle of equal treatment and the applicant’s fundamental rights.
(1) Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market For Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act) (OJ 2022 L 277, p. 1).