- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-593/18: Action brought on 28 September 2018 — BS (Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality) v Parliament
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0593
62018TN0593
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
26.11.2018
Official Journal of the European Union
C 427/99
Action brought on 28 September 2018 — BS (represented by: M. Maes and J.-N. Louis, lawyers) v Parliament
(Case T-593/18)
(2018/C 427/130)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: BS (represented by: M. Maes and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)
Defendant: European Parliament
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the notice of amendment No. 15, dated 10 August 2017, concerning the applicant’s pension rights;
—annul, so far as necessary, the decision to recover the purported overpayment of EUR 1 589,16 in respect of the months of September, October and November 2017 and EUR 4 815,16 as shown on the pension slip for December 2017;
—order the Parliament to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 2 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union inasmuch as the contested decisions are vitiated by a manifest error of assessment.
2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to good administration (Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union) in so far as the defendant failed to give adequate reasons for its decision and failed to observe the applicant’s right to be heard and his right to have access to his file.