EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-280/24: Action brought on 26 May 2024 – ExactCut v EUIPO (exactcut)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0280

62024TN0280

May 26, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/4103

(Case T-280/24)

(C/2024/4103)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Applicant: ExactCut s.r.o. (Brno, Czech Republic) (represented by: S. Hejdová, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU figurative mark exactcut – Application No 18 846 758

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 March 2024 in Case R 2240/2023-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision;

alter the contested decision such that the processing of the application for trade mark No 18 846 758 will continue for all goods and services in the application, and the trade mark applied for will be published for all goods and services in the application;

order EUIPO to pay the applicant the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law

Infringement of the principles of sound administration, of equal treatment and of legal certainty (legitimate expectations) under Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;

Failure to fulfil the obligation to give proper reasons for decisions under Article 41(1) and Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;

An error of assessment regarding the fulfilment of the absolute grounds for refusal of registration under Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia