I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Series C
4.12.2023
(Case T-529/22) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Civil service - EIB staff - Remuneration - Dependent child allowance - Education allowances - Recovery of sums paid but not due - Lack of competence of the author of the act - Infringement of the limitation period)
(C/2023/1158)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: QT (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)
Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: G. Faedo and J. Pawlowicz, acting as Agents, and by A. Glavasevic and V. Wellens, lawyers)
By her action under Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Investment Bank (EIB) of 28 September 2021 to proceed with the recovery of an amount of EUR 61 186,61 wrongly paid towards education allowances, dependent child allowances and related benefits, for the period from July 2014 to June 2017, and of the EIB’s decision of 20 May 2022 rejecting her administrative appeal and, secondly, compensation for the damage which she allegedly suffered as a result of those decisions.
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the European Investment Bank (EIB) of 28 September 2021 for the recovery of an amount of EUR 61 186,61 wrongly paid to QT towards education allowances, dependent child allowances and related benefits, for the period from July 2014 to June 2017, and the EIB’s decision of 20 May 2022 to reject her administrative appeal;
2.Dismisses the claim for damages;
3.Orders the EIB to pay the costs.
Language of the case: French.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1158/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
* * *
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 389, 10.10.2022.
* * *