I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
21.10.2024
(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark evolver - Partial revocation - Genuine use of a mark - Article 18(1) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Proof of genuine use - Late submission of documents - Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001)
(C/2024/6089)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: OSR Enterprises AG (Cham, Switzerland) (represented by: U. Lüken and J. Grensemann, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Śliwińska and E. Markakis, acting as Agents)
Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, interveners before the General Court: Mathias Möckel (Chemnitz, Germany), Torsten Gramann, (Chemnitz) (represented by: M. Hirsch and F. Bauer, lawyers)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 November 2022 (Case R 1302/2021-5).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders OSR Enterprises AG to pay the costs.
—
Language of the case: German.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6089/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *