- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-181/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 October 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landessozialgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen — Germany) — Jobcenter Krefeld — Widerspruchsstelle v JD (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Free movement of persons — Workers — Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 — Article 7(2) — Equal treatment — Social advantages — Article 10 — Children attending school — Directive 2004/38/EC — Article 24 — Social assistance — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 4 — Article 70 — Special non-contributory cash benefits — Migrant worker with dependent children attending school in the host Member State)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0181
62019CA0181
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.11.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 414/4
(Case C-181/19) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Free movement of persons - Workers - Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 - Article 7(2) - Equal treatment - Social advantages - Article 10 - Children attending school - Directive 2004/38/EC - Article 24 - Social assistance - Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 - Article 4 - Article 70 - Special non-contributory cash benefits - Migrant worker with dependent children attending school in the host Member State)
(2020/C 414/04)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Jobcenter Krefeld — Widerspruchsstelle
Defendant: JD
Operative part of the judgment
1.Article 7(2) and Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which provides that a national of another Member State and his minor children, all of whom have, in the former Member State, a right of residence based on Article 10 of that regulation, by virtue of those children attending school in that State, are automatically and in all circumstances excluded from entitlement to benefits to cover their subsistence costs. That interpretation is not called into question by Article 24(2) of Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States, amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC;
2.Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems, read together with Article 3(3) and Article 70(2) of that regulation, must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which provides that a national of another Member State and his minor children, all of whom have, in the former Member State, a right of residence based on Article 10 of Regulation No 492/2011, by virtue of those children attending school in that State, and are integrated there in a social security system within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Regulation No 883/2004, are automatically and in all circumstances excluded from entitlement to special non-contributory cash benefits.
(*)
OJ C 182, 27.5.2019.