- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-178/24: Action brought on 2 April 2024 – Reverbel v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0178
62024TN0178
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2024/4090
(Case T-178/24)
(C/2024/4090)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Corinne Reverbel (Dému, France) (represented by: D. Protat, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should
—annul the implied refusal decision of the European Commission dated 7 February 2024 to grant the applicant access to 5 series of documents originally applied for via the internet platform ‘Ask the EU’.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging the infringement of the right to good administration laid down in Article 41 of the Charter for Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
2.Second plea in law, alleging the inapplicability of the exception relating to the protection of privacy.
3.Third plea in law, alleging the inapplicability of the exception to the protection of commercial interests of undertakings.
4.Third plea in law, alleging the overriding interest justifying access to the documents requested.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4090/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—