I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2015/C 138/78)
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian
Applicant: Tubes Radiatori Srl (Resana, Italy) (represented by: S. Verea, K. Muraro, M. Balestriero and P. Menapace, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Antrax It Srl (Resana, Italy)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant
Design at issue: Community design for ‘heating radiators’ — Community design No 169 370-0002
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 December 2014 in Case R 1643/2014-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision and, consequently, find and declare that Community design No 169 370-0002, belonging to Tubes Radiatori Srl, is valid, since it is new and has individual character;
—order OHIM to pay the costs pursuant to Article 87 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court of the European Union.
—Infringement of Article 1d of Regulation (EC) No 216/96, the adversarial principle, and the duty to provide a statement of reasons;
—Objection of res judicata.