I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(Case T-9/15)
(2015/C 089/39)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Ball Europe GmbH (Zürich, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Renck, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Crown Hellas Can SA (Athens, Greece)
Proprietor of the design at issue: the applicant
Design at issue: Community design No 230 990-0006
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 September 2014 in Case R 1408/2012-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order the defendant and — in the event of a formal intervention — also the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs, including the costs incurred by the applicant.
—Infringement of Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002.