- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-124/10: Order of the General Court of 26 October 2015 — Lidl Stiftung v OHIM — Vinotasia (VITASIA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TB0124
62010TB0124
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
21.12.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 429/23
(Case T-124/10) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))
(2015/C 429/30)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (Neckarsulm, Germany) (represented by: A. Marx and M. Schaeffer, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider and D. Botis, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Vinotasia GmbH (Coblenz, Germany) (represented by: M. Gail, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 January 2010 (Case R 1054/2008-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Vinotasia GmbH and Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to rule on the action.
2.Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG and Vinotasia GmbH shall bear their own costs and each pay half of those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 134, 22.5.2015.