- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2010. # Biocaps v European Commission. # Competition - Administrative procedure - Decision ordering an inspection - Article 20(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Existence of the addressee of the decision - Action manifestly unfounded in law. # Case T-24/09.
ECLI:EU:T:2010:238
62009TO0024
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-24/09)
Competition – Administrative procedure – Decision ordering an inspection – Article 20(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Existence of the addressee of the decision – Action manifestly unfounded in law
Re:
APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 6524 of 29 October 2008, in Case COMP/39510, ordering Laboratoire Champagnat Desmoulins Philippakis, and all of the entities controlled directly or indirectly by it, to submit to an inspection pursuant to Article 20(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 [EC] and 82 [EC] (OJ 2002 L 1, p. 1).
Operative part
1.The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded in law.
2.Biocaps is ordered to bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.