I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-381/17)(Action for annulment - Directive 2011/35/EU - Merger of public limited liability companies - Nullity of the merger - No distinction between absolute nullity and relative nullity of the merger - Time-limit for bringing an action - Delay - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2018/C 042/40)
Language of the case: Romanian
Applicant: Ibram Acsen (Bucharest, Romania) (represented by: C. Gagu, lawyer)
Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: M. Pencheva and C. Ionescu Dima, acting as Agents) and Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Petrova Cerchia and A. Varnav, acting as Agents)
Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the partial annulment of Article 22(1)(c) of Directive 2011/35/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 concerning mergers of public limited liability companies (OJ 2011, L 110, p. 1).
1.The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
2.Mr Ibram Acsen is ordered to pay the costs.
Language of the case: Romanian.
* * *
(1) OJ C 269, 14.8.2017.