EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-38/24: Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2025 – OMV v EUIPO (Combination of the colours blue and green) (EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Mark consisting in a combination of the colours blue and green – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Legal certainty – Equal treatment – Sound administration – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TA0038

62024TA0038

June 11, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/3897

21.7.2025

(Case T-38/24)

(EU trade mark - International registration designating the European Union - Mark consisting in a combination of the colours blue and green - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Legal certainty - Equal treatment - Sound administration - Obligation to state reasons - Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

(C/2025/3897)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: OMV AG (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: C. Schumacher and B. Kapeller-Hirsch, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Nicolás Gómez, acting as Agent)

Interveners in support of the applicant: Marques (Leicester, United Kingdom) (represented by: R. Chalmers Hoynck van Papendrecht, A. Padial Martínez, J. Słupski and S. Fischoeder, lawyers), International Trademark Association (INTA) (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: N. Parrotta, M. Perraki, Y. Øyehaug Opsvik and T. de Haan, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 8 November 2023 (Case R 798/2023-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders each party to bear its own costs.

OJ C, C/2024/1711, 4.3.2024.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3897/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia