I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2013/C 79/40
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Association pour la Défense de l’Épargne et de l’Actionnariat des Salariés de France Télécom-Orange (Paris, France) (represented by: A.-L. Lefort des Ylouses and A.-S. Gay, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—declare admissible the ADEAS’s application;
—rule that the decision is annulled;
—order the Commission to pay all the costs.
By its application, the applicant is seeking the annulment of Commission Decision C(2011) 9403 final of 20 December 2011, declaring compatible with the internal market, under certain conditions, the aid implemented by the French Republic in favour of France Télécom concerning the reform of the method of financing the pensions of public-service employees working for France Télécom (State aid No C 25/2008 (ex NN 23/2008)). (1)
In support of the action, the applicant puts forward four pleas in law which are essentially similar or identical to those put forward in Case T-2/13 CFE-CGC France Télécom-Orange v Commission.
(1)
OJ 2012 L 279, p. 1.