- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-418/13: Order of the General Court of 21 January 2015 — Richter + Frenzel v OHIM — Ferdinand Richter (Richter + Frenzel) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TB0418
62013TB0418
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.3.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 89/25
(Case T-418/13)(1)
((Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal - No need to adjudicate))
(2015/C 089/30)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Richter + Frenzel GmbH (Würzburg, Germany) (represented by: D. Altenburg, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by: A. Pohlmann, and subsequently by: D. Botis, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Ferdinand Richter GmbH (Pasching, Austria) (represented by: M. Grötschl, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 March 2013 (Case R 2001/2011-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Ferdinand Richter GmbH and Richter + Frenzel GmbH + Co. KG.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The applicant and intervener shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs of the defendant.
(1)
OJ C 325, 9.11.2013.