- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-121/25: Action brought on 19 February 2025 – Gharbi v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025TN0121
62025TN0121
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2025/1903
7.4.2025
(Case T-121/25)
(C/2025/1903)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Asma Gharbi (Steinfort, Luxembourg) (represented by: L. Levi and S. Rodrigues, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—declare the present action admissible and well-founded;
—annul the contested decision, and where necessary, the implied decision to reject the complaint previously lodged against the contested decision;
—order the defendant to pay all the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action seeking the annulment of the salary slip for May 2024 in so far as it does not include a social assistance payment provided for by Commission’s Decision C(2015) 4907 final of 22 July 2015 on a payment of social assistance to some Commission staff members employed in Luxembourg, the applicant relies on four pleas in law:
1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of Decision C(2015) 4907 final of 22 July 2015 and a manifest error of assessment;
2.Second plea in law, based on a breach of the principle of equal treatment;
3.Third plea in law, based on a breach of the fundamental right to dignity in working conditions.
4.Fourth plea in law, based on a breach of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1903/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—