- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-65/22: Judgment of the General Court of 8 March 2023 — PS v EIB (Civil service — EIB staff — Social security — Insurance against the risk of accident and of occupational disease — Total and permanent invalidity — Occupational nature of the disease — Contract concluded with an insurance company — Extent of the obligations to be met by the EIB)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0065
62022TA0065
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 155/52
(Case T-65/22) (1)
(Civil service - EIB staff - Social security - Insurance against the risk of accident and of occupational disease - Total and permanent invalidity - Occupational nature of the disease - Contract concluded with an insurance company - Extent of the obligations to be met by the EIB)
(2023/C 155/66)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: PS (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)
Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: K. Carr and E. Manoukian, acting as Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)
Re:
By his action under Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the applicant seeks, first, annulment of the decision of the European Investment Bank (EIB) of 12 July 2021, in so far as it refused the applicant payment of EUR 233 500 in respect of material and non-material damage suffered; second, an order that the EIB pay the applicant compensation in respect of the occupational disease from which he claims to be suffering; and, third, an order that the EIB pay the sum of EUR 24 000 as compensation in respect of the alleged non-material damage in view of the state of the applicant’s health.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders PS to pay the costs.
(1) OJ C 128, 21.3.2022.