EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-68/23, Finanzamt O: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 8 February 2023 — M-GbR v Finanzamt O

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0068

62023CN0068

February 8, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

22.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/14

(Case C-68/23, Finanzamt O)

(2023/C 179/23)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant and appellant on a point of law: M-GbR

Defendant and respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Finanzamt O

Questions referred

1.Does a single-purpose voucher exist within the meaning of Article 30a(2) of the VAT Directive (1) where:

the place of supply of the services to which the voucher relates is established in known in so far as those services are intended to be supplied to final consumers within the territory of a Member State,

but the fiction of the first subparagraph of Article 30b(1) first sentence of the VAT Directive, according to which also the transfer of the voucher between taxable persons is considered as providing the service to which the voucher relates, gives rise to a service in the territory of another Member State?

2.If the first question is answered in the negative (and hence a multi-purpose voucher exists in the present case): Does subparagraph 1 of Article 30b(2) of the VAT Directive, according to which the actual provision of the services in return for a multi-purpose voucher accepted as consideration or part consideration by the supplier is subject to VAT pursuant to Article 2 of the VAT Directive, whereas each preceding transfer of that multi-purpose voucher is not subject to VAT, preclude a differently substantiated tax obligation (judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 3 May 2012, Lebara, C-520/10, EU:C:2012:264)?

Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1), in the version of Council Directive (EU) 2016/1065 of 27 June 2016 amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards the treatment of vouchers (OJ 2016 L 177, p. 9).

* * *

Language of the case: German

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia