- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-678/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Krakowa — Podgórza w Krakowie (Poland) lodged on 3 November 2022 — Profi Credit Polska S.A. v G.N.
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CN0678
62022CN0678
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.1.2023
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 35/33
(Case C-678/22)
(2023/C 35/39)
Language of the case: Polish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Profi Credit Polska S.A.
Defendant: G.N.
Questions referred
1.Should Article 10(2)(f) in conjunction with Article 3(j) of Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC (1) in view of the principle of EU law effectiveness and the purpose of this directive, and in the light of Article 3(1) and (2) in conjunction with Article 4(1) of Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (2) be interpreted in such a way that they oppose the practice of including in consumer credit contracts the content of which is not the result of individual arrangements between the supplier (lender) and consumer (borrower) provisions that provide for interest not only on the amount disbursed to the consumer, but also on non-interest credit costs (that is to say, commissions or other fees that are not components of the credit amount disbursed to the consumer, and that make up the total amount to be paid by the consumer in performance of their obligation under the consumer credit contract)?
2.Should Article 10(2)(f) and (g) of Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC (OJ 2008 L 133, p. 66) in view of the principle of EU law effectiveness and the purpose of this directive, and in the light of Article 5 of Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29) be interpreted in such a way that they oppose the practice of including in consumer credit contracts the content of which is not the result of individual arrangements between the supplier (lender) and consumer (borrower) provisions disclosing only the borrowing rate and total value of capitalised interest expressed in amounts that the consumer is required to pay in the performance of their obligation arising under this contract, without at the same time clearly informing the consumer that the basis for calculating the capitalised interest (expressed as an amount) is an amount other than the credit amount actually disbursed to the consumer, and in particular, that it is the sum of the credit amount disbursed to the consumer and non-interest credit costs (that is to say, commissions or other fees that are not components of the credit amount disbursed to the consumer, and that make up the total amount to be paid by the consumer in performance of their obligation under the consumer credit contract)?
(1) OJ 2008 L 133, p. 66.
(2) OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.