EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-370/23: Action brought on 5 July 2023 — Al-Assad v Council

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN0370

62023TN0370

July 5, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

21.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/42

(Case T-370/23)

(2023/C 296/47)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Samer Kamal Al-Assad (Qardaha, Syria) (represented by: W. Woll, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/844 (1) which adds the applicant’s name to Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 36/201;

annul Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2023/847 (2) which adds the applicant’s name to Annex I to Decision 2013/255/PESC;

order the European Union to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging an error of assessment. The applicant maintains, first, that his membership of the Assad family is not sufficiently established and, second, that he is not involved in any drug trafficking. In addition, he puts forward a plea of illegality of Article 27(2)(b) and Article 28(2)(b) of Decision 2013/255/CFSP.

2.Second plea in law, alleging a violation of the right to an effective remedy. The applicant invokes in this respect the obligation to hold court proceedings to punish serious offenses and the impossibility for the Council to punish him for drug trafficking.

3.Third plea in law, alleging damage to the applicant’s reputation.

4.Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to property.

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/844 of 24 April 2023 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2023 L 109 I, p. 1).

Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2023/847 of 24 April 2023 implementing Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2023 L 109 I, p. 26).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia