- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 March 2007. # Saiwa SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Appeal - Community trade mark - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Likelihood of confusion - Application for a figurative mark including the word element 'SELEZIONE ORO Barilla' - Opposition by the holder of the national and international trade mark ORO and the national trade mark ORO SAIWA - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded. # Case C-245/06 P.
ECLI:EU:C:2007:160
62006CO0245
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C‑245/06 P)
Appeal – Community trade mark – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Likelihood of confusion – Application for a figurative mark including the word element ‘SELEZIONE ORO Barilla’ – Opposition by the holder of the national and international trade mark ORO and the national trade mark ORO SAIWA – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 5 April 2006 in Case T-344/03 Saiwa v OHIM, by which the Court of First Instance dismissed an action, brought by the applicant for the national and international word mark ‘ORO’ and the national word mark ‘ORO SAIWA’ for goods in Class 30, for annulment of Decision R 480/2002-4 of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 18 July 2003 dismissing the appeal brought against the decision of the Opposition Division which rejected the opposition filed against the application to register a figurative mark including the word elements ‘SELEZIONE ORO’ and ‘Barilla’ for goods in Class 30 – Similarity of marks – Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1993 L 11, p. 1).
Operative part:
The appeal is dismissed.
Saiwa SpA is ordered to pay the costs.