31 March 2023 (*1)

(Appeal – Interim relief – Public procurement – Confidentiality)

In Case C‑141/23 P(R),

APPEAL under the second paragraph of Article 57 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 8 March 2023,

Telefónica de España SA, established in Madrid (Spain), represented by J. Blanco Carol and F. González Díaz, abogados, and P. Stuart, Barrister,

appellant,

the other parties to the proceedings being:

European Commission, represented by L. André and M. Ilkova, acting as Agents,

defendant at first instance,

BT Global Services Belgium BV, established in Machelen (Belgium),

intervener at first instance,

THE VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE COURT,

after hearing the Advocate General, M. Szpunar,

makes the following

1By its appeal, Telefónica de España SA asks the Court of Justice to set aside the order of the Vice-President of the General Court of the European Union of 28 February 2023, Telefónica de España v Commission (T‑170/22 R-RENV, not published, EU:T:2023:89), by which the General Court dismissed its application seeking, first, suspension of the operation of the decision of the European Commission of 21 January 2022 relating to the call for tenders DIGIT/A 3/PR/2019/010, entitled ‘Trans-European Services for Telematics between Administrations (TESTA)’, informing the appellant that its tender had not been successful in the procurement procedure and announcing the imminent signing of a contract with the successful tenderer and, secondly, an order requiring the Commission to suspend the signing of that contract.

2By document lodged at the Registry of the Court of Justice on 14 March 2023, Telefónica de España requested that the Court treat as confidential, vis-à-vis BT Global Services Belgium BV, intervener at first instance, part of Annexes P.10 and P.11 to its appeal, which correspond to the observations submitted by the Commission in Case T‑170/22 R and in Case C‑478/22 P(R)-R respectively. To that end, Telefónica de España produced a non-confidential version of those annexes.

3In that regard, it should be noted that, by document lodged at the Registry of the General Court on 1 July 2022 in Case T‑170/22 R, Telefónica de España requested that the General Court treat part of the procedural documents as confidential vis-à-vis BT Global Services Belgium.

4By order of 14 December 2022, Telefónica de España v Commission (T‑170/22 R-RENV, not published), the Vice-President of the General Court decided to reserve his decision on that request for confidential treatment and to order, provisionally, the Registrar of the General Court to serve, on BT Global Services Belgium, the non-confidential version of each of the procedural documents served on the other parties.

5In that context, it must be noted that Article 171(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice provides that the appeal is to be served on the other parties to the relevant case before the General Court. Furthermore, pursuant to Article 172 of those rules, any party to the relevant case before the General Court having an interest in the appeal being allowed or dismissed may submit a response within two months after service, on that party, of the appeal. It follows from those provisions that the appeal and the other procedural documents lodged before the Court of Justice are also to be served, in principle, on the parties granted leave to intervene before the General Court.

6However, where a party is requesting, vis-à-vis a party that intervened before the General Court, confidential treatment in respect of material produced before the Court of Justice which has already been treated as confidential vis-à-vis that same party in the proceedings at first instance, that same confidential treatment must, in principle, be maintained for the purposes of the proceedings before the Court of Justice (order of the President of the Court of Justice of 19 January 2023, Google and Alphabet v Commission, C‑738/22 P, not published, EU:C:2023:44, paragraph 5 and the case-law cited).

7Although, in the present case, the Vice-President of the General Court did not give a definitive ruling on the request for confidential treatment made by Telefónica de España and referred to in paragraph 3 of the present order, the measures which he decided to adopt in his order of 14 December 2022, Telefónica de España v Commission (T‑170/22 R-RENV, not published), in practice ensure, provisionally, that the elements in the file which are covered by that request are given confidential treatment which should, in principle, be maintained for the purposes of the proceedings before the Court of Justice.

8It must be stated that the information in Annexes P.10 and P.11 to the appeal which, by way of the present request, Telefónica de España wishes to prevent being disclosed to BT Global Services Belgium, forms part of the information covered by the request for confidential treatment made at first instance by Telefónica de España.

9In addition, since Annex P.11 to the appeal corresponds to the Commission’s observations lodged in Case C‑478/22 P(R)-R, it must be pointed out that, in accordance with the order of the Vice-President of the Court of Justice of 4 October 2022, Telefónica de España v Commission (C‑478/22 P(R)-R, not published, EU:C:2022:802), only a non-confidential version of those observations was served on BT Global Services Belgium in the proceedings in that case.

10In the light of the foregoing, it is necessary to grant Telefónica de España’s request that the information redacted in the non-confidential version of Annexes P.10 and P.11 to the appeal be treated as confidential vis-à-vis BT Global Services Belgium, intervener at first instance. Accordingly, only the non-confidential version of those annexes shall be disclosed by the Registrar to BT Global Services Belgium.

On those grounds, the Vice-President of the Court hereby orders:

Luxembourg, 31 March 2023.

Registrar

*

Language of the case: English.