I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Staff of eu-LISA - Disciplinary proceedings - Disciplinary penalty - Reprimand - Implementing provisions concerning administrative inquiries - Plea of illegality - Article 110 of the Staff Regulations - Failure to consult the Staff Committee - Rights of the defence and right to be heard - Articles 12, 12a, 17 and 19 of the Staff Regulations - Error of assessment - Principle of good administration - Article 10 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations - Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials - Liability - Non-material damage)
(2022/C 198/53)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: NV (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (eu-LISA) (represented by: M. Chiodi, acting as Agent, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)
Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of eu-LISA of 3 February 2020 to impose on the applicant the penalty of a reprimand and, secondly, compensation for the non-material harm allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of that decision.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders NV to pay the costs.
(1) OJ C 19, 18.1.2021.