EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-121/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (France) lodged on 18 December 2014 — Association nationale des opérateurs détaillants en énergie (ANODE) v Premier ministre, Ministre de l’économie, de l’industrie et du numérique, Commission de régulation de l’énergie, GDF Suez

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015CN0121

62015CN0121

December 18, 2014
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/8

(Case C-121/15)

(2015/C 178/08)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Association nationale des opérateurs détaillants en énergie (ANODE)

Defendants: Premier ministre, Ministre de l’économie, de l’industrie et du numérique, Commission de régulation de l’énergie, GDF Suez

Questions referred

1.Must the intervention of a Member State consisting in requiring the incumbent supplier to offer to supply final consumers with natural gas at regulated tariffs, but which does not preclude competing offers from being made at prices lower than those tariffs by the incumbent supplier or alternative suppliers, be regarded as leading to a situation whereby price levels for the supply of natural gas to final consumers are determined independently of free market forces and as constituting, by its very nature, an obstacle to the achievement of a competitive market in natural gas, as referred to in Article 3(1) of Directive 2009/73/EC (1)?

2.If the first question is to be answered in the affirmative, what criteria should be used to assess the compatibility with Directive 2009/73/EC of such State intervention in the price of the supply of natural gas to final consumers?

In particular:

(a)To what extent and under what conditions does Article 106(2) TFEU, read in conjunction with Article 3(2) of Directive 2009/73/EC, enable Member States to pursue, by intervening in prices for the supply of natural gas to consumers, objectives other than maintaining the price of supply at a reasonable level, such as ensuring secure supply and territorial cohesion?

(b)In the light of the objectives of secure supply and territorial cohesion, does Article 3(2) of Directive 2009/73/EC permit a Member State to intervene in determining the price of the supply of natural gas on the basis of the principle that the incumbent supplier’s costs be covered in full, and may the costs intended to be covered by the tariffs include components other than the portion representing long-term supply?

Directive 2009/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas and repealing Directive 2003/55/EC (OJ 2009 L 211, p. 94).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia