- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-508/10: Action brought on 19 October 2010 — Seba Diș Tįcaret ve Naklįyat v OHIM — von Eicken (SEBA TRADITION ESTABLISHED 1932 20 FILTER)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TN0508
62010TN0508
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
18.12.2010
Official Journal of the European Union
C 346/56
(Case T-508/10)
()
2010/C 346/110
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Seba Diș Tįcaret ve Naklįyat A.S. (Istanbul, Turkey) (represented by: H. Wilde, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Johann Wilhelm von Eicken GmbH (Lübeck, Germany)
Form of order sought
—Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 18 August 2010 in Case R 0559/2009-4;
—Order the defendant to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: Coloured figurative mark, which contains the word elements ‘ESTABLISHED 1932 SEBA TRADITION’, for goods in Class 34.
Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The Applicant.
Applicant for the declaration of invalidity: Johann Wilhelm von Eicken GmbH
Trade mark right of applicant for the declaration: German figurative mark, which contains the word elements ‘ESTABLISHED 1770 JOHANN WILHELM VON EICKEN TRADITION’, for goods in Class 34.
Decision of the Cancellation Division: The application was granted.
Decision of the Board of Appeal: The appeal was rejected.
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1) because there is no likelihood of confusion of the marks at issue.
Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).