- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 March 2012. # ThyssenKrupp Steel Europe AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark Highprotect - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009. # Case T-565/10.
ECLI:EU:T:2012:107
62010TJ0565
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T‑565/10)
Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark Highprotect — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009
Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Absolute grounds for refusal — Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications which may serve to designate the characteristics of goods (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 7(1)(c)) (see paras 15-18)
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 September 2010 (Decision R 1038/2010‑1), concerning an application for registration of the word mark Highprotect as a Community trade mark.
Operative part
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders ThyssenKrupp Steel Europe AG to pay the costs.