- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-772/22: Action brought on 10 December 2022 — Fibrecycle v EUIPO (BACK-2-NATURE)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0772
62022TN0772
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
6.2.2023
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 45/23
(Case T-772/22)
(2023/C 45/31)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Fibrecycle Pty Ltd (Helensvale, Australia) (represented by: T. Stein, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the mark BACK-2-NATURE — Application for registration No 1 485 655
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 October 2022 in Case R 1699/2020-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.