- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-147/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — Atresmedia Corporación de Medios de Comunicación SA v Asociación de Gestión de Derechos Intelectuales (AGEDI), Artistas Intérpretes o Ejecutantes, Sociedad de Gestión de España (AIE) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual property — Rights related to copyright — Directive 92/100/EEC — Article 8(2) — Directive 2006/115/EC — Article 8(2) — Communication to the public of an audiovisual work incorporating a phonogram or a reproduction of a phonogram — Single equitable remuneration)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CA0147
62019CA0147
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.1.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 28/4
(Case C-147/19) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Intellectual property - Rights related to copyright - Directive 92/100/EEC - Article 8(2) - Directive 2006/115/EC - Article 8(2) - Communication to the public of an audiovisual work incorporating a phonogram or a reproduction of a phonogram - Single equitable remuneration)
(2021/C 28/05)
Language of the case: Spanish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Atresmedia Corporación de Medios de Comunicación SA
Defendants: Asociación de Gestión de Derechos Intelectuales (AGEDI), Artistas e Intérpretes o Ejecutantes, Sociedad de Gestión de España (AIE)
Operative part of the judgment
Article 8(2) of Council Directive 92/100/EEC of 19 November 1992 on rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property and Article 8(2) of Directive 2006/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property must be interpreted as meaning that the single equitable remuneration referred to in those provisions must not be paid by the user where he or she makes a communication to the public of an audiovisual recording containing the fixation of an audiovisual work in which a phonogram or a reproduction of that phonogram has been incorporated.
(*)
Language of the case: Spanish
ECLI:EU:C:2021:140