I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
24.2.2025
(C/2025/1122)
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Kct GmbH & Co. KG (Rosenfeld, Germany) (represented by: M. Braun, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the EU motion mark, consisting of the movement of a clip window – Application No 18 906 690
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 October 2024 in Case R 740/2024-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1122/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—