EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-584/19: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2022 — thyssenkrupp v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — Market for the production and distribution of flat carbon steel — Decision declaring the concentration incompatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement — Relevant market — Assessment of the effects of the transaction on competition — Commitments — Obligation to state reasons)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TA0584

62019TA0584

June 22, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/38

(Case T-584/19) (*)

(Competition - Concentrations - Market for the production and distribution of flat carbon steel - Decision declaring the concentration incompatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement - Relevant market - Assessment of the effects of the transaction on competition - Commitments - Obligation to state reasons)

(2022/C 303/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: thyssenkrupp AG (Duisburg and Essen, Germany) (represented by: M. Klusmann, J. Ziebarth and M. Dästner, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Conte, T. Franchoo, I. Zaloguin and C. Sjödin, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2019) 4228 final of 11 June 2019 declaring a concentration to be incompatible with the internal market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement (Case M.8713 — Tata Steel/thyssenkrupp/JV).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders thyssenkrupp AG to pay the costs.

(*)

Language of the case: English

(1) OJ C 357, 21.10.2019.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia