- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-129/15: Action brought on 19 March 2015 — Intesa Sanpaolo v OHIM (WAVE 2 PAY)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TN0129
62015TN0129
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.5.2015
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 155/35
(Case T-129/15)
(2015/C 155/41)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Intesa Sanpaolo SpA (Turin, Italy) (represented by: P. Pozzi and F. Cecchi, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘WAVE 2 PAY’ — Application for registration No 12 258 117
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 January 2015 in Case R 1857/2014-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—declare that there was a breach and incorrect application of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—declare that there was a breach of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009, and also that there were contradictions in the contested decision; and consequently
—annul the contested decision;
—order OHIM to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Breach of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Breach of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.