- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-631/16: Judgment of the General Court of 23 May 2019 — Remag Metallhandel and Jaschinsky v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Anti-dumping — OLAF’s insistence that Member States recover anti-dumping duties relating to any importation of silicon metal originating in Taiwan without proof that that silicon metal originated in China — Regulation (EC) No 398/2004 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 467/2010 — Causal link)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TA0631
62016TA0631
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
15.7.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 238/15
(Case T-631/16) (*)
(Non-contractual liability - Anti-dumping - OLAF’s insistence that Member States recover anti-dumping duties relating to any importation of silicon metal originating in Taiwan without proof that that silicon metal originated in China - Regulation (EC) No 398/2004 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 467/2010 - Causal link)
(2019/C 238/18)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: Remag Metallhandel GmbH (Steyr, Austria) and Werner Jaschinsky (St. Ulrich bei Steyr, Austria) (represented by: M. Lux, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Caeiros and A. Lewis, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application based on Article 268 TFEU, seeking compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of the request by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) that the customs authorities of the Member States recover anti-dumping duties for consignments of silicon exported from Taiwan to the European Union.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Remag Metallhandel GmbH and Mr Werner Jaschinsky to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English.
ECLI:EU:C:2019:140
* * *
(1) OJ C 392, 24.10.2016.