EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-258/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Dâmbovița (Romania) lodged on 25 May 2010 — Nicușor Grigore v Regia Națională a Pădurilor Romsilva — Direcția Silvică București

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010CN0258

62010CN0258

May 25, 2010
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

14.8.2010

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/20

(Case C-258/10)

()

2010/C 221/33

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Nicușor Grigore

Defendant: Regia Națională a Pădurilor Romsilva — Direcția Silvică București

Questions referred

1.Does the time during which a forester, who works eight hours a day under his individual contract of employment, is required to carry out wardenship duties in respect of a certain section of the forest for which he is liable to disciplinary action, the payment of compensation and civil or criminal sanctions, as the case may be, for any damage ascertained in the area under his control, regardless of the time when the damage occurs, constitute ‘working time’ within the meaning of Article 2(1) of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time? (1)

2.Is the answer to question 1 different where the forester resides in accommodation provided for him within the section of the forest with the management of which he is entrusted?

3.Are the provisions of Article 6 of Directive 2003/88/CE, entitled ‘Maximum weekly working time’, infringed where, even though the individual contract of employment provides for a maximum working time of 8 hours a day and 40 hours a week, the forester must in fact, because of legal obligations, carry out wardenship duties on a continuous basis in respect of the section of the forest with the management of which he is entrusted?

4.In the event that question 1 is answered in the affirmative, is the employer obliged to pay wages or similar remuneration in respect of the time during which the forester is required to carry out wardenship duties?

5.In the event that question 1 is answered in the negative, what legal rules apply to the hours during which a forester is responsible for carrying out wardenship duties in respect of the forest with the management of which he is entrusted?

(1) OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia