EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-650/23, Hembesler: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg (Austria) lodged on 31 October 2023 — E EAD v DW

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0650

62023CN0650

October 31, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

Series C

C/2024/1239

12.2.2024

(Case C-650/23, Hembesler)

(C/2024/1239)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant (defendant at first instance): E EAD

Respondent (applicant at first instance): DW

Question referred

Must Article 7(1), Article 4(3) and Article 2(j) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, be interpreted as meaning that the operating air carrier is obliged to compensate a passenger in the case where, in the context of a package tour, the passenger has a confirmed reservation by a tour operator on a return flight, the tour operator informed the passenger on the day before the planned (return) flight that the flight had been rescheduled due to a change in flight number, flight time and final destination; the passenger therefore did not present himself for boarding for the flight originally booked under the conditions laid down in Article 3(2) of the regulation; however, the flight originally booked is actually operated as planned and the air carrier would also have carried the passenger if he had presented himself for boarding under the conditions laid down in Article 3(2) of that regulation?

The present case is designated by a fictitious name which does not correspond to the actual name of a party to the proceedings.

Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1239/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia