- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-803/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos Aukščiausiasis Teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 20 December 2018 — AAS BALTA v UAB GRIFS AG
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CN0803
62018CN0803
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
4.3.2019
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 82/15
(Case C-803/18)
(2019/C 82/16)
Language of the case: Lithuanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant in cassation: AAS BALTA
Other party to the proceedings in cassation: UAB GRIFS AG
Question referred
Must Articles 15(5) and 16(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters be construed as meaning that, in the case of large-risk insurance, an agreement conferring jurisdiction included in the insurance contract concluded between the policyholder and the insurer may be relied on against a person insured under that contract who has not expressly subscribed to that clause and who is habitually resident or established in a Member State other than that of the policyholder and the insurer?
(1) Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1).