EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) of 5 April 2006. # Habib Kachakil Amar v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Community trade mark - Figurative mark in the form of a longitudinal line ending with a triangle - Refusal to register - Lack of distinctive character - Acquisition of a distinctive character through use. # Case T-388/04.

ECLI:EU:T:2006:107

62004TJ0388

April 5, 2006
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

(Case T-388/04)

Community trade mark – Figurative mark in the form of a longitudinal line ending with a triangle – Refusal to register – Lack of distinctive character – Acquisition of a distinctive character through use

Community trade marks – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks devoid of any distinctive character (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 7(3)) (see points 39-42)

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 July 2004 (R 175/2004-1) which refused to register the figurative mark ‘Longitudinal line ending with a triangle’ as a Community trade mark.

Information relating to the case:

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

––

Community trade mark sought:

Figurative mark consisting of a longitudinal line ending with a triangle – Application No 3.235.157 for goods in Class 25 (clothes, shoes, hats, including sports shoes)

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

––

Mark or sign cited:

––

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Dismissal of the application, the mark being considered as falling under the absolute grounds for refusal referred to in Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94 on the Community trade mark

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Dismissal of the appeal

Operative part

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia