EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 March 2012. # Octapharma Pharmazeutika Produktionsgesellschaft mbH v European Medicines Agency (EMA). # Medicinal products for human use - Changes to a plasma master file (PMF) - Fees payable to the EMA - Act with adverse effects - Measure merely confirmatory - Manifest inadmissibility. # Case T-573/10.

ECLI:EU:T:2012:114

62010TO0573

March 8, 2012
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

(Case T‑573/10)

Medicinal products for human use — Changes to a plasma master file (PMF) — Fees payable to the EMA — Act with adverse effects — Measure merely confirmatory — Manifest inadmissibility

4. Actions for annulment — Action against a decision confirming an earlier decision not challenged within the time limits — Inadmissibility — Meaning of confirmatory decision — Decision recalling the legal basis of an earlier decision and reacting to a new argument submitted well after the expiry of the time limit for bringing an action against the earlier decision — Included (Art. 263 TFEU) (see paras 54-60)

Re:

APPLICATION for annulment of the letter of 21 October 2010 (EMA/643425/2010) by which the European Medicines Agency (EMA) refused to repay to the applicant the sum of EUR 180 700 corresponding to the difference between, on the one hand, the sum the applicant paid to it in respect of fees for the examination of variations to the terms of a marketing authorisation for medicinal products for human use and veterinary medicinal products and, on the other hand, the sum which the applicant maintains it should have paid.

Operative part

1.The action is dismissed.

2.Octapharma Pharmazeutika Produktionsgesellschaft mbH is ordered to pay the costs.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia