EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-638/15: Action brought on 12 November 2015 — Alcohol Countermeasure Systems (International) v OHIM — Lion Laboratories (ALCOLOCK)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TN0638

62015TN0638

November 12, 2015
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

18.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/50

(Case T-638/15)

(2016/C 016/60)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Alcohol Countermeasure Systems (International) Inc. (Toronto, Canada) (represented by: E. Baud, P. Marchiset, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Lion Laboratories Ltd (Barry, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘ALCOLOCK’ — Community trade mark No 8 443 301

Procedure before OHIM: Invalidity proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 August 2015 in Case R 1323/2014-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision;

declare valid the CTM Trademark owned and registered in the name of Alcohol Countermeasure Systems (International), Inc.;

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Infringement of Articles 8(2) and 15(2) of Regulation No 207/2009, Article 10(2) of Directive No 2008/95 and Article 19(2) of TRIPS, lack of motivation and misrepresentation of the facts;

Infringement of Articles 57(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 and insufficient motivation;

Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 and of Article 296 TFEU and violation of the definition of genuine use pursuant to Regulation No. 207/2009.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia