I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-82/13) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Request for a preliminary ruling - Common agricultural policy - Joint actions - Non-payment of financial aid by the Commission - Withdrawal by a Member State of its contribution - Question of fact - Internal situation - Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court - Description of the factual context - Insufficiency - Hypothetical question - Manifest inadmissibility)
2013/C 377/08
Language of the case: Italian
Applicant: Società cooperativa Madonna dei miracoli
Defendant: Regione Abruzzo, Ministero delle Politiche Agricole e Forestali
Request for a preliminary ruling — Consiglio di Stato — Interpretation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2052/88 of 24 June 1988 on the tasks of the Structural Funds and their effectiveness and on coordination of their activities between themselves and with the operations of the European Investment Bank and the other existing financial instruments (OJ 1988 L 185, p. 9), of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4253/88 of 19 December 1988 laying down provisions for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 2052/88 as regards coordination of the activities of the different Structural Funds between themselves and with the operations of the European Investment Bank and the other existing financial instruments (OJ 1988 L 374, p. 1), of Council Regulation (EEC) No 866/90 of 29 March 1990 on improving the processing and marketing conditions for agricultural products (OJ 1990 L 91, p. 1), and of Commission Decision 90/342/EEC of 7 June 1990 on the selection criteria to be adopted for investments for improving the processing and marketing conditions for agricultural and forestry products (OJ 1990 L 173, p. 71) — Joint actions — Non-payment of financial aid by the Commission — Member State not having paid its contribution following the Commission’s failure to pay the aid
1.The Court of Justice of the European Union manifestly lacks jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Consiglio di Stato (Italy).
2.As to the remainder, the request for a preliminary ruling is manifestly inadmissible.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 147, 25.5.2013.