I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2021/C 62/58)
Language in which the application was lodged: Polish
Applicant: Advanced Superabrasives, Inc. (Mars Hill, North Carolina, United States) (represented by: D. Piróg and A. Rytel, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Adi Srl (Thiene, Italy)
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU figurative mark ‘ASI ADVANCED SUPERABRASIVES’ — Application No 17 163 734
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 October 2020 in Case R 2713/2019-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs
—in the event that the intervener intervenes in the proceedings, order that party to bear its own costs.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 27(3)(b) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;
—Infringement of Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in conjunction with Article 27(4) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625; and
—Infringement of Article 71(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in conjunction with Article 27(3)(b) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.