- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-163/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Mercantil 7 de Barcelona (Spain) lodged on 11 March 2021 — AD and Others v PACCAR Inc, DAF TRUCKS NV, DAF Trucks Deutschland GmbH
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CN0163
62021CN0163
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
28.6.2021
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 252/7
(Case C-163/21)
(2021/C 252/13)
Language of the case: Spanish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: AD and Others
Defendants: PACCAR Inc, DAF TRUCKS NV, DAF Trucks Deutschland GmbH
Question referred
Must Article 5(1) of Directive 2014/104/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 November 2014 on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union (1) be interpreted as meaning that the disclosure of relevant evidence refers exclusively to existing documents in the control of the defendant or a third party or, in contrast, can Article 5(1) also include the disclosure of documents that must be created ex novo by the party to whom the request for information is made by compiling or classifying information, knowledge or data held by it?
(1) OJ 2014 L 349, p. 1.