EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.
Case C-293/19 P: Appeal brought on 10 April 2019 by Et Djili Soy Dzhihangir Ibryam against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 12 February 2019 in Case T-231/18: Et Djili Soy Dzhihangir Ibryam v EUIPO - Lupu (Djili)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CN0293
62019CN0293
April 10, 2019
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.11.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 399/20
—
(Case C-293/19 P)
(2019/C 399/23)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Et Djili Soy Dzhihangir Ibryam (represented by: C-R Romițan, lawyer)
Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office
By order of 2 October 2019 the Court of Justice (Eighth Chamber) held that the appeal is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded and that Et Djili Soy Dzhihangir Ibryam shall bear its own costs.
—
EurLex Case Law
AI-Powered Case Law Search
Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions
Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free TrialAt Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.