- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-753/23, Krasiliva: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 27 February 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud – Czech Republic) – A.N. v Ministerstvo vnitra (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons – Directive 2001/55/EC – Articles 8 and 11 – Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/382 – Successive applications for a residence permit for the purposes of temporary protection in several Member States – Examination of the subsequent application – Right to an effective remedy)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CA0753
62023CA0753
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/2168
(Case C-753/23,
(1)
Krasiliva)
(2)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons - Directive 2001/55/EC - Articles 8 and 11 - Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/382 - Successive applications for a residence permit for the purposes of temporary protection in several Member States - Examination of the subsequent application - Right to an effective remedy)
(C/2025/2168)
Language of the case: Czech
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant at first instance: A.N.
Defendant at first instance: Ministerstvo vnitra
Operative part of the judgment
Article 8(1) of Council Directive 2001/55/EC of 20 July 2001 on minimum standards for giving temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons and on measures promoting a balance of efforts between Member States in receiving such persons and bearing the consequences thereof
must be interpreted as precluding national legislation under which the granting of a residence permit is to be refused to a person enjoying temporary protection, referred to in Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/382 of 4 March 2022 establishing the existence of a mass influx of displaced persons from Ukraine within the meaning of Article 5 of Directive 2001/55/EC, and having the effect of introducing temporary protection, where that person has already applied for, but has not yet obtained, such a permit in another Member State.
Article 8(1) of Directive 2001/55, read in the light of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
must be interpreted as meaning that a person enjoying temporary protection under that directive has a right to an effective remedy before a tribunal against a decision to reject as inadmissible an application for a residence permit, within the meaning of Article 8 thereof.
—
(1) OJ C C/2024/2013.
(2) The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2168/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—