- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-634/18: Judgment of the General Court of 17 September 2019 — Geske v EUIPO (revolutionary air pulse technology) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark revolutionary air pulse technology — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TA0634
62018TA0634
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.11.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 399/55
(Case T-634/18) (*)
(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark revolutionary air pulse technology - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2019/C 399/67)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: André Geske (Lübeck, Germany) (represented by: R. Albrecht, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Sesma Merino and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 September 2018 (Case R 2721/2017-2), relating to an application for registration of the word sign revolutionary air pulse technology as an EU trade mark.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Mr André Geske to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: German.
ECLI:EU:C:2019:399
* * *
(1) OJ C 4, 7.1.2019.