- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-292/18: Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2020 — Portugal v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Expenditure incurred by Portugal — Articles 32 and 33 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 — Article 54 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 — Definition of national courts)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TA0292
62018TA0292
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 77/43
(Case T-292/18) (*)
(EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Expenditure incurred by Portugal - Articles 32 and 33 of Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 - Article 54 of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 - Definition of national courts)
(2020/C 77/61)
Language of the case: Portuguese
Parties
Applicant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes, P. Estêvão, J. Saraiva de Almeida and P. Barros da Costa, acting as Agents)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Rechena and A. Sauka, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/304 of 27 February 2018 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2018 L 59, p. 3), in that it excludes from EU financing an amount of EUR 1 052 101,05 relating to expenditure declared by the Portuguese Republic.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders the Portuguese Republic to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.
(*)
OJ C 249, 16.7.2018